
AGM Global Vision quotes 1,800 m, 2.5× our figure, because makers usually measure against a person’s full height rather than their width. Why the numbers differ
AGM Varmint V2 LRF 35-384
- Approx. price
- ~$1,995
- Sensor
- 384×288 · 12 µm
- Lens
- 35 mm · 3×
- Weight
- 18.3 oz
We may earn a commission. Price and availability on Amazon’s site may differ.
Night shooting where ranging matters — hogs and coyotes past 150 yards
01Specifications
As published by AGM Global Vision. Sources: agmglobalvision.com (product page, 2026 catalog), downloads.agmglobalvision.com (datasheet).
- Sensor
- 384×288
- Pixel pitch
- 12 µm
- NETD
- <20 mK
- Refresh rate
- 50 Hz
- Lens
- 35 mm
- Digital zoom
- up to 24×
- Field of view
- 7.5° horizontal
- Display
- 1024x768 OLED
- Claimed detection
- 1,800 m
- Claim basis
- 6 ft (1.8 m) object
- Run time
- 6 h
- Battery type
- 18650
- Weight
- 18.3 oz
- Length
- 8.4″
- Records video
- Yes
- Wi-Fi
- Yes
- IP rating
- IP67
- Warranty
- 5 years
- Approx. price
- ~$1,995
02Pros and cons
From the published specs. What owners report is in the next section.
- Sensitive sensor that picks out small heat differences on humid or rainy nights (104th-best of 285 that publish it)
- Built-in laser rangefinder that feeds the ballistic calculator
- Takes 18650 batteries you can swap in the field
- Light at 18.3 oz, 32nd-lightest of the 194 riflescopes here
- Waterproof (IP67), survives a dunking
- Records video and connects to a phone app
- Warranty: 5 years
- Short 35 mm lens: a wide view, but less reach than a 50 mm scope
- Entry-level 384×288 sensor, with less detail than a 640
- Zoom past 3× is digital and gets blurry
03What owners say
owner discussions, 2025Summarised from 5 public owner discussions in 2025. Owner experience, not a measurement.
Almost every Varmint V2 35-384 conversation is the same question: is it worth roughly $200 to $300 over the Rattler V2 35-384 for the rangefinder and ballistic calculator? Owners who have both lean toward the Varmint, partly for the rangefinder and partly for the physical zoom knob, and one owner who looked through a friend's Varmint after hunting with an older ATN 384 says the difference in clarity was obvious.
The rangefinder is also the main complaint. One owner says it ranges out to about 600 yards when it works, but often will not return a reading for the first couple of minutes after a cold start, and he has passed on two hogs while waiting for it to wake up. Another owner found it only returns a reading if the scope is held quite steady, which is why the unit gets criticised. AGM reps at SHOT Show 2025 told an owner that the Varmint line would be retired as rangefinders became standard on the Rattler V3, so buyers in 2025 were weighing a discounted Varmint against waiting.
- Owners who own both a Rattler and a Varmint prefer the Varmint, citing the physical zoom knob as much as the rangefinder.
- When the rangefinder does lock on, one owner ranges out to around 600 yards, and the ballistic calculator matters to people shooting subsonic loads past about 150 yards.
- Runs on standard 18650 cells, so owners who already carry 18650 gear swap batteries rather than buy AGM packs; one gets three to four hours per cell depending on screen time.
- The rangefinder can be slow to wake: one owner says it rarely works in the first two minutes from a cold start, and sometimes drops out again after sitting idle, which cost him shots on two hogs.
- It needs to be held steady to return a reading; a new owner using it handheld kept getting dashes until he worked that out.
- The image gets grainy and smears for a while after power-on, especially while zooming, until the unit warms up.
Varmint V2 or Rattler V2 in 35-384?
Owners say the rangefinder and ballistic calculator are the real difference, with the Varmint's zoom knob a bonus. A Rattler V2 owner who hunts open fields says he missed having a rangefinder until he ranged landmarks in daylight. If your shots stay inside about 150 yards with fast supersonic ammo, several owners say the rangefinder matters less.
Is the rangefinder really unreliable?
Some owners say it is, mostly when the unit is cold or idle. Another owner thinks much of the complaint comes from not holding the scope still enough, and expected it to behave better once mounted on a rifle.
04Compare the 35-384
05Related units

AGM Adder V2 35-384
- Sensor
- 384×288
- Pitch · Hz
- 12 µm · 50
- Lens
- 35 mm

AGM Adder V2 LRF 35-384
- Sensor
- 384×288
- Pitch · Hz
- 12 µm · 50
- Lens
- 35 mm

AGM Rattler V2 35-384
- Sensor
- 384×288
- Pitch · Hz
- 12 µm · 50
- Lens
- 35 mm