← Comparisons
Side by side

Nocpix MATE Ultra S60R vs Pulsar Krypton 2 FXG50

The MATE Ultra S60R runs a 1280×1024 core at 12 µm behind a 60 mm lens; the Krypton 2 FXG50 runs 640×480 at 12 µm behind 50 mm. The MATE Ultra S60R has 4.3× the pixels. On the Johnson yardstick they detect a person at 1,250 m and 1,042 m and recognize one at 313 m and 260 m; the boxes say 3,100 m and 2,300 m. The MATE Ultra S60R is lighter by 0.7 oz. Approximate prices are ~$6,099 and ~$5,000.

Estimated range, standing human, clear air
Nocpix MATE Ultra S60R1280×1024 · 12 µm · 60 mm
192 m identify313 m recognize1,250 m detectbox says 3,100 m (unspecified)
Pulsar Krypton 2 FXG50640×480 · 12 µm · 50 mm
160 m identify260 m recognize1,042 m detectbox says 2,300 m (1.8 m object)
501002005001k2k5k m
Estimated from pixel pitch and lens focal length using the Johnson criteria (2, 8 and 13 pixels across a 0.5 m human critical dimension), clear air, 50 % probability. A model of the optics, not a measurement — real range depends on temperature contrast, humidity and the animal.
SpecNocpixNocpix MATE Ultra S60RPulsarPulsar Krypton 2 FXG50
Published
Sensor1280×1024640×480
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD<15 mK<40 mK
Refresh rate60 Hz50 Hz
Lens60 mm50 mm
Base magnification
Field of view14.7° horizontal8.8° horizontal
Display1920x1200 AMOLED1920x1080 AMOLED
Claimed detection3,100 m2,300 m
Claim basisunspecified1.8 m object
Run time4 h11 h
Battery type18650Removable pack
Weight19.8 oz20.5 oz
Length5.5″5.2″
Laser rangefinderYesNo
Ballistic calculatorYesNo
Records videoYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
IP ratingIP67IPX7
Warranty5 years3 years (5 with registration)
Country of originChina
Approx. price~$6,099~$5,000
Derived here
IFOV0.200 mrad0.240 mrad
Est. detection1,250 m1,042 m
Est. recognition313 m260 m
Est. identification192 m160 m
Claim ÷ estimate2.5×2.2×
Derived field of view14.6°8.8°
Pixels per degree87.772.9
Where to buyNocpixPulsar

Tinted rows are where these two differ. Prices are approximate.