← ComparisonsCalculated from the sensor's pixel pitch and the lens focal length, for clear air.
Side by side
Guide TU650 M 3.0 vs Pard Ocelot 640 LRF
The TU650 M 3.0 runs a 640×512 core at 12 µm behind a 50 mm lens; the Ocelot 640 LRF runs 640×512 at 12 µm behind 50 mm. The Ocelot 640 LRF is lighter by 12.9 oz. Approximate prices are ~$3,799 and ~$3,999.
How far you can see a person
Make out detailTell what it isSpot itMaker’s claim
Guide TU650 M 3.0640×512 · 12 µm · 50 mm
160 m make out detail260 m tell what it is1,042 m spot itmaker claims 2,600 m
Pard Ocelot 640 LRF640×512 · 12 µm · 50 mm
160 m make out detail260 m tell what it is1,042 m spot itmaker claims 2,600 m
501002005001k2k5k m
| Spec | GuideGuide TU650 M 3.0 | PardPard Ocelot 640 LRF |
|---|---|---|
| Published | ||
| Sensor | 640×512 | 640×512 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 12 µm |
| NETD | 18 mK | ≤20 mK |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Lens | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Base magnification | 3.7× | 2.5× |
| Digital zoom | up to 30× | up to 20× |
| Field of view | 8.8° horizontal | 7° horizontal |
| Display | 2560x2560 AMOLED | 800x800 LCD |
| Claimed detection | 2,600 m | 2,600 m |
| Claim basis | unspecified | human |
| Run time | 14 h | 5 h |
| Battery type | Internal + removable | Removable pack |
| Weight | 35.7 oz | 22.8 oz |
| Length | 18″ | 7.2″ |
| Laser rangefinder | Yes | Yes |
| Ballistic calculator | No | Yes |
| Records video | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Warranty | 5 years (10 years on sensor) | 3 years |
| Approx. price | ~$3,799 | ~$3,999 |
| Derived here | ||
| IFOV | 0.240 mrad | 0.240 mrad |
| Est. detection | 1,042 m | 1,042 m |
| Est. recognition | 260 m | 260 m |
| Est. identification | 160 m | 160 m |
| Claim ÷ estimate | 2.5× | 2.5× |
| Derived field of view | 8.8° | 8.8° (published 7° — differs 25%) |
| Pixels per degree | 72.9 | 72.9 |
| Where to buy | Guide → | Amazon → |
Tinted rows are where these two differ. Prices are approximate.