← ComparisonsCalculated from the sensor's pixel pitch and the lens focal length, for clear air.
Side by side
ATN BlazeTrek 619 vs Teledyne FLIR Scout Pro
The BlazeTrek 619 runs a 640×512 core at 12 µm behind a 19 mm lens; the Scout Pro runs 640×480 at 17 µm behind 19 mm. The BlazeTrek 619 has 1.1× the pixels. The BlazeTrek 619 is lighter by 6.3 oz. Approximate prices are ~$1,049 and ~$2,449.
How far you can see a person
Make out detailTell what it isSpot itMaker’s claim
ATN BlazeTrek 619640×512 · 12 µm · 19 mm
61 m make out detail99 m tell what it is396 m spot itmaker claims 910 m
Teledyne FLIR Scout Pro640×480 · 17 µm · 19 mm
43 m make out detail70 m tell what it is279 m spot itmaker claims 500 m
501002005001k2k5k m
| Spec | ATNATN BlazeTrek 619 | Teledyne FLIRTeledyne FLIR Scout Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Published | ||
| Sensor | 640×512 | 640×480 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 17 µm |
| NETD | <25 mK | <38 mK |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 30 Hz |
| Lens | 19 mm | 19 mm |
| Base magnification | 1.25× | — |
| Digital zoom | up to 10× | up to 8× |
| Field of view | 22.8° horizontal | 32° horizontal |
| Display | 800x600 OLED | 1024x768 |
| Claimed detection | 910 m | 500 m |
| Claim basis | unspecified (ATN product page 1000 yd) | human heat signature ('up to 500 meters') |
| Run time | 6.5 h | 6 h |
| Battery type | Internal Li-ion | Internal Li-ion |
| Weight | 11.3 oz | 17.6 oz |
| Length | 6.2″ | 7.6″ |
| Laser rangefinder | No | No |
| Ballistic calculator | No | No |
| Records video | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Warranty | 3 years | 2 years (5 with registration) |
| Approx. price | ~$1,049 | ~$2,449 |
| Derived here | ||
| IFOV | 0.632 mrad | 0.895 mrad |
| Est. detection | 396 m | 279 m |
| Est. recognition | 99 m | 70 m |
| Est. identification | 61 m | 43 m |
| Claim ÷ estimate | 2.3× | 1.8× |
| Derived field of view | 22.9° | 32° |
| Pixels per degree | 28 | 20 |
| Where to buy | Amazon → | Amazon → |
Tinted rows are where these two differ. Prices are approximate.