← Comparisons
Side by side

ATN BlazeTrek 619 vs Teledyne FLIR Scout Pro

The BlazeTrek 619 runs a 640×512 core at 12 µm behind a 19 mm lens; the Scout Pro runs 640×480 at 17 µm behind 19 mm. The BlazeTrek 619 has 1.1× the pixels. The BlazeTrek 619 is lighter by 6.3 oz. Approximate prices are ~$1,049 and ~$2,449.

How far you can see a person
ATN BlazeTrek 619640×512 · 12 µm · 19 mm
61 m make out detail99 m tell what it is396 m spot itmaker claims 910 m
Teledyne FLIR Scout Pro640×480 · 17 µm · 19 mm
43 m make out detail70 m tell what it is279 m spot itmaker claims 500 m
501002005001k2k5k m
Calculated from the sensor's pixel pitch and the lens focal length, for clear air.
SpecATNATN BlazeTrek 619Teledyne FLIRTeledyne FLIR Scout Pro
Published
Sensor640×512640×480
Pixel pitch12 µm17 µm
NETD<25 mK<38 mK
Refresh rate50 Hz30 Hz
Lens19 mm19 mm
Base magnification1.25×—
Digital zoomup to 10×up to 8×
Field of view22.8° horizontal32° horizontal
Display800x600 OLED1024x768
Claimed detection910 m500 m
Claim basisunspecified (ATN product page 1000 yd)human heat signature ('up to 500 meters')
Run time6.5 h6 h
Battery typeInternal Li-ionInternal Li-ion
Weight11.3 oz17.6 oz
Length6.2″7.6″
Laser rangefinderNoNo
Ballistic calculatorNoNo
Records videoYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
IP ratingIP67IP67
Warranty3 years2 years (5 with registration)
Approx. price~$1,049~$2,449
Derived here
IFOV0.632 mrad0.895 mrad
Est. detection396 m279 m
Est. recognition99 m70 m
Est. identification61 m43 m
Claim ÷ estimate2.3×1.8×
Derived field of view22.9°32°
Pixels per degree2820
Where to buyAmazon →Amazon →

Tinted rows are where these two differ. Prices are approximate.