← ComparisonsCalculated from the sensor's pixel pitch and the lens focal length, for clear air.
Side by side
ATN Binox 6 Dual 256x192 vs ATN ThOR LTV 256 3-9x
The Binox 6 Dual 256x192 runs a 256×192 core at 12 µm behind a 25 mm lens; the ThOR LTV 256 3-9x runs 256×192 at 12 µm behind 25 mm. The ThOR LTV 256 3-9x is lighter by 2.1 oz. Approximate prices are ~$1,495 and ~$1,095.
How far you can see a person
Make out detailTell what it isSpot itMaker’s claim
ATN Binox 6 Dual 256x192256×192 · 12 µm · 25 mm
80 m make out detail130 m tell what it is521 m spot itmaker claims 1,500 m
ATN ThOR LTV 256 3-9x256×192 · 12 µm · 25 mm
80 m make out detail130 m tell what it is521 m spot itmaker claims 1,190 m
501002005001k2k5k m
| Spec | ATNATN Binox 6 Dual 256x192 | ATNATN ThOR LTV 256 3-9x |
|---|---|---|
| Published | ||
| Sensor | 256×192 | 256×192 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 12 µm |
| NETD | ≤20 mK | — |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Lens | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Base magnification | 6× | 3× |
| Digital zoom | up to 48× | up to 9× |
| Field of view | 7° horizontal | 7.1° horizontal |
| Display | 1920x1080 OLED | 1280x720 |
| Claimed detection | 1,500 m | 1,190 m |
| Claim basis | unspecified (ATN product page 1500 m) | human-sized target (ATN product page 1300 yd) |
| Run time | 8 h | 9 h |
| Battery type | 18650 | Internal Li-ion |
| Weight | 25 oz | 22.9 oz |
| Length | 8.3″ | 11.5″ |
| Laser rangefinder | Yes | No |
| Ballistic calculator | No | No |
| Records video | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| IP rating | IP67 | — |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
| Country of origin | — | USA |
| Approx. price | ~$1,495 | ~$1,095 |
| Derived here | ||
| IFOV | 0.480 mrad | 0.480 mrad |
| Est. detection | 521 m | 521 m |
| Est. recognition | 130 m | 130 m |
| Est. identification | 80 m | 80 m |
| Claim ÷ estimate | 2.9× | 2.3× |
| Derived field of view | 7° | 7° |
| Pixels per degree | 36.4 | 36.4 |
| Where to buy | Amazon → | Amazon → |
Tinted rows are where these two differ. Prices are approximate.