← Comparisons
Side by side

Armasight Warden 640 2-8x35 vs Pard Leopard 640 LRF

The Warden 640 2-8x35 runs a 640×480 core at 12 µm behind a 35 mm lens; the Leopard 640 LRF runs 640×512 at 12 µm behind 35 mm. The Leopard 640 LRF has 1.1× the pixels. The Leopard 640 LRF is lighter by 3.1 oz.

How far you can see a person
Armasight Warden 640 2-8x35640×480 · 12 µm · 35 mm
112 m make out detail182 m tell what it is729 m spot itmaker claims 1,300 m
Pard Leopard 640 LRF640×512 · 12 µm · 35 mm
112 m make out detail182 m tell what it is729 m spot itmaker claims 1,800 m
501002005001k2k5k m
Calculated from the sensor's pixel pitch and the lens focal length, for clear air.
SpecArmasightArmasight Warden 640 2-8x35PardPard Leopard 640 LRF
Published
Sensor640×480640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD—≤20 mK
Refresh rate60 Hz50 Hz
Lens35 mm35 mm
Base magnification2×2.2×
Digital zoomup to 8×up to 17.6×
Field of view12.57° horizontal12.5° horizontal
Display1024x768 OLED1920x1080 AMOLED
Claimed detection1,300 m1,800 m
Claim basishuman-sized targetunspecified
Run time4 h6 h
Battery typeCR12318650
Weight15.8 oz12.7 oz
Length5.5″6.7″
Laser rangefinderNoYes
Ballistic calculatorNoNo
Records videoYesYes
Wi-FiNoYes
IP ratingIP67IP67
Warranty3 years (with registration)3 years
Approx. price~$2,499~$2,499
Derived here
IFOV0.343 mrad0.343 mrad
Est. detection729 m729 m
Est. recognition182 m182 m
Est. identification112 m112 m
Claim ÷ estimate1.8×2.5×
Derived field of view12.5°12.5°
Pixels per degree51.151.1
Where to buyArmasight →Pard →

Tinted rows are where these two differ. Prices are approximate.