← Comparisons
Side by side

AGM Taipan V2 25-384 vs Pulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro

The Taipan V2 25-384 runs a 384×288 core at 12 µm behind a 25 mm lens; the Axion 2 XQ35 Pro runs 384×288 at 17 µm behind 35 mm. On the Johnson yardstick they detect a person at 521 m and 515 m and recognize one at 130 m and 129 m; the boxes say 1,200 m and 1,300 m. The Taipan V2 25-384 is lighter by 2.5 oz. Approximate prices are ~$1,445 and ~$1,500.

Estimated range, standing human, clear air
AGM Taipan V2 25-384384×288 · 12 µm · 25 mm
80 m identify130 m recognize521 m detectbox says 1,200 m (6 ft (1.8 m) object)
Pulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro384×288 · 17 µm · 35 mm
79 m identify129 m recognize515 m detectbox says 1,300 m (unspecified)
501002005001k2k5k m
Estimated from pixel pitch and lens focal length using the Johnson criteria (2, 8 and 13 pixels across a 0.5 m human critical dimension), clear air, 50 % probability. A model of the optics, not a measurement — real range depends on temperature contrast, humidity and the animal.
SpecAGM Global VisionAGM Taipan V2 25-384PulsarPulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro
Published
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm17 µm
NETD<20 mK<25 mK
Refresh rate50 Hz50 Hz
Lens25 mm35 mm
Base magnification2.5×
Digital zoomup to 8×up to 4×
Field of view10.5° horizontal10.7° horizontal
Display1024x768 OLED640x400 AMOLED
Claimed detection1,200 m1,300 m
Claim basis6 ft (1.8 m) objectunspecified
Run time6.5 h11 h
Battery type18650Removable pack
Weight10.9 oz13.4 oz
Length6.8″6″
Laser rangefinderNoNo
Ballistic calculatorNoNo
Records videoYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
IP ratingIP67IPX7
Warranty5 years3 years (5 with registration)
Approx. price~$1,445~$1,500
Derived here
IFOV0.480 mrad0.486 mrad
Est. detection521 m515 m
Est. recognition130 m129 m
Est. identification80 m79 m
Claim ÷ estimate2.3×2.5×
Derived field of view10.5°10.7°
Pixels per degree36.536
Where to buyAGM Global VisionPulsar

Tinted rows are where these two differ. Prices are approximate.