← ComparisonsCalculated from the sensor's pixel pitch and the lens focal length, for clear air.
Side by side
AGM Taipan V2 19-320 vs ATN ODIN LT 320 4-8x
The Taipan V2 19-320 runs a 320×256 core at 12 µm behind a 19 mm lens; the ODIN LT 320 4-8x runs 320×240 at 12 µm behind 35 mm. The Taipan V2 19-320 has 1.1× the pixels. The Taipan V2 19-320 is lighter by 1.5 oz. Approximate prices are ~$745 and ~$1,699.
How far you can see a person
Make out detailTell what it isSpot itMaker’s claim
AGM Taipan V2 19-320320×256 · 12 µm · 19 mm
61 m make out detail99 m tell what it is396 m spot itmaker claims 950 m
ATN ODIN LT 320 4-8x320×240 · 12 µm · 35 mm
112 m make out detail182 m tell what it is729 m spot itmaker claims 1,380 m
501002005001k2k5k m
| Spec | AGM Global VisionAGM Taipan V2 19-320 | ATNATN ODIN LT 320 4-8x |
|---|---|---|
| Published | ||
| Sensor | 320×256 | 320×240 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 12 µm |
| NETD | <35 mK | ≤15 mK |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Lens | 19 mm | 35 mm |
| Base magnification | 3× | 4× |
| Digital zoom | up to 22.5× | up to 8× |
| Field of view | 9.2° horizontal | 6.3° horizontal |
| Display | 1280x960 LCOS | 1280x960 |
| Claimed detection | 950 m | 1,380 m |
| Claim basis | 6 ft (1.8 m) object | human-sized target (ATN product page 1510 yd; ATN manual labels it 'Human Detection Range') |
| Run time | 6 h | 2.5 h |
| Battery type | 18650 | CR123 |
| Weight | 10.6 oz | 12.1 oz |
| Length | 6.8″ | 5.7″ |
| Laser rangefinder | No | No |
| Ballistic calculator | No | No |
| Records video | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| IP rating | IP67 | — |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
| Country of origin | — | USA |
| Approx. price | ~$745 | ~$1,699 |
| Derived here | ||
| IFOV | 0.632 mrad | 0.343 mrad |
| Est. detection | 396 m | 729 m |
| Est. recognition | 99 m | 182 m |
| Est. identification | 61 m | 112 m |
| Claim ÷ estimate | 2.4× | 1.9× |
| Derived field of view | 11.5° (published 9.2° — differs 25%) | 6.3° |
| Pixels per degree | 27.7 | 51 |
| Where to buy | Amazon → | ATN → |
Tinted rows are where these two differ. Prices are approximate.